Hi, I'm Randy Corman, Renton City Councilmember. I am the most senior member of the council, currently in my 25th year (I have been elected seven times). I pay for this website with my own funds. Please recognize that all views expressed in my journal entries are my own, and not the official position of Renton City Council, other councilmembers, nor the city of Renton. Thanks for reading.
In a post last week I described my hopes that we could preserve our beautiful Piazza fountain. But on Monday night, Renton Council announced plans to turn this fountain into a planter.
Renton’s Piazza fountain
The plans also eliminates the Piazza’s other water feature, the babbling brook featuring Renton’s “Summer Breeze” sculpture of a young girl stepping gently into the water.
No more water. Renton’s lovely “Summer Breeze” girl has been stepping into a 40-foot long babbling stream bed for over 20 years, but the water has been removed and the girl will soon follow.
Together, these two lovely water features have visually anchored the Piazza since the early 2000s. And the splashing water features incorporate generous bench seating which provide critical cool resting areas for scores of visitors on hot days.
The City of Renton has been reworking it’s website during the past year, and has become difficult (at least for now) to find full agenda packets for upcoming meetings and past meetings.
This section lists upcoming meetings. The live version can be found here, and includes clickable links to the detail agenda packets.This section lists recent meetings. The live version can be found here and includes clickable links that go to the agenda packets.
Renton’s Piazza Fountain has delighted visitors for over 20 years with its three levels of rushing, splashing water. This picture was from a farmers market two years ago.
Renton’s Piazza Fountain has welcomed visitors to Renton’s downtown since the Piazza park was built 24 years ago. In addition to making downtown more inviting, The fountain and surrounding Piazza are a gateway to Renton for everyone arriving by bus through the adjacent transit center.
The beautiful fountain is dedicated to beloved Renton resident Marge Richtor, who served our community for decades in numerous roles including on Renton Parks Board. She was a friend and inspiration to all of us who knew her. A plaque on the fountain commemorates the dedication.
Three of my young relatives enjoying the Piazza fountain two years ago
In recent years, the fountain has not been maintained as well as in the past. And this year, even though temperatures are in the 80s and people are out and about, the fountain has been entirely neglected.
This should not be allowed to go on for long. It’s time to clean the fountain and get it flowing again. As in the case with our broken clock tower, the public notices when these community centerpieces are neglected.
This photo, taken a week ago, shows the fountain is currently neglected. It desperately needs to be cleaned and maintained. Even with the Farmers Market relocated, the fountain reflects on the health and vitality of downtown Renton.
Just as importantly, the city has been making plans to revise the Piazza landscape. If they do so, the fountain should remain the inviting centerpiece that it has been for the past two decades.
This photo, taken during the Farmers Market a week ago, shows the Piazza has been emptied of programmed activities in apparent preparation of a landscaping project. However, I don’t even think a contractor has been chosen yet for the landscape project, or a final design approved. The fountain should remain part of any redesign, and should be bubbling with clean water in the meantime.
If you share my view that this fountain should be cleaned, maintained, and preserved you can let the Mayor and Council know by emailing mayor@rentonwa.gov and council@rentonwa.gov.
Staples receipt for costs Renton outsourced while supplying records to Superior Court; Logan Six applicants have been asked to pay this, even though it’s five times the published fee schedule.
The Renton Fee Schedule, approved by Renton City Council, is pretty clear. The City can charge residents 15 cents per page for printed or photocopied pages. The City Clerk can also waive these charges, and often does, for residents that have not used an excessive amount of photocopying or printing services in the past.
So why is the city charging 78 cents per page to Renton residents appealing the Logan Six project? The question has North Renton residents justifiably perturbed. They’ve been paying taxes to fund the Renton City Clerk’s office for decades, and now the first time they need copies of some city documents the city is gouging them. The City is not even using the photocopiers that taxpayers funded– they’re having the copies made at Staples, a retail store.
The high charge is five times the city’s published fee schedule, which is arguably illegal. But just as upsetting to North Renton residents, the usurious charge looks like an effort on the part of someone in the city to make it even more expensive and difficult for Superior Court to review this appeal. When the Council made the last-hour change to send appeals to superior court instead of hearing them themselves (claiming it was an improvement) they didn’t mention that the city would charge 78 cents per page for data sent to the court.
Even more frustrating, by using Staples, a retail store, instead of the Clerk’s office, the bill for the copying now includes sales tax which would ordinarily be exempt on public records per RCW 82.08.02525.
Numerous emergency vehicles and personnel respond to the scene of a light plane runway overrun. The two occupants were able to walk away from the accident. (Photo courtesy of Gary Palmer)
Renton Police reported on the incident on X, as follows: “A small plane skidded off the runway into Lake Washington at the north end of the Renton Airport. The pilot & passenger climbed out of the plane uninjured. The National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration have been notified and will investigate.”
It’s great news that no one was hurt. This type of investigation typically takes months, so we won’t know the cause for a while.
Renton School District has sent out another quarterly mailer that misleads 130,000 residents about their taxes. Renton’s school taxes have been on a fast-rising trend since 2020 as shown in the chart below. Where the mailer says “we continue to see a decrease of our school district total combined tax rate even as our voters support school construction measures,” district leaders appear to be either: (a) trying to mislead the public into thinking that taxes are dropping because of their good stewardship; or (b) demonstrating they don’t understand math. Either way, it raises issues about whether they are qualified to teach our children math. School tax rates-per-thousand are dropping simply because assessed valuations are skyrocketing, and the net effect is that our actual taxes paid for schools are going up sharply.
The District did drop the most flagrant sentence from their last mailer that said “that’s a $1500 savings for the owner of a home valued at $715,000” after I posted about it, but even without this statement the graph and verbiage remains misleading.
Since they are leading an educational system, I look forward to one day receiving a mailer that says “Yes, we acknowledge your school taxes are going up, and here are the reasons we think you are getting good value for the extra money you are giving us” followed by a list of achievements and plans proving they are spending every dollar wisely in a way that improves student performance.
I’ve voted for every school bond issue in the past, and I care deeply about our schools. In return for this support I expect an honest accounting of the cost trends and results from the district. Whoever is suggesting that they make it look like our taxes are dropping in every one of these mailers should be sent for retraining or serve a time-out in the corner.
In reality, the taxes for the school district are rising quickly. This is a typical Renton Highlands house (owned by my son) valued at $723,000 in 2025. This house appreciated at a normal rate with all the others, with no remodeling. The local school taxes went up significantly.
This 2021-2025 chart for my son’s typical Renton home comes directly from King County’s Tax Transparency Tool. The red bar is the local schools tax, and the blue is our state school tax. 56% of our property taxes goes to schools. Total school tax has increased from $3,134 to $4,092. Local school taxes have increased from $1,658 to $2,469, up $811, a 32% increase (about twice the rate of inflation).
While currently open as of this writing, Coulon Beach swim area was closed during the Memorial Day weekend and the first above 80-degree day of the season.
Coulon Beach Park swim area was closed on this sunny Memorial Day weekend because of high bacterial counts. It was one of only two beaches on Lake Washington closed for this reason. Unfortunately this has become more common in recent years, with Coulon’s swim area sometimes closed for weeks at a time.
Renton’s Coulon Park swim beach was closed while most local beaches were open during this warm holiday weekend.
While it’s clear that ducks and geese are contributing to the problem, it’s less obvious to Park visitors that storm drains in western Renton Highlands, the Landing and even I-405 are also contributing to the problem by adding pollution to “Johns Creek” which empties next to Coulon’s swim beach.
Renton has been working for decades to improve the water quality in Johns Creek, and a Stormwater Management Action Plan (SMAP) is in place to improve it. Renton Stormwater utility fees, along with grants when they can be obtained, pay for this work.
Johns Creek is not the only creek that carries Renton’s surface water into Coulon Park; Kennydale Creek deposits Kennydale’s surface water about a mile to the north. But in addition to emptying further away from the swim beach, Kennydale Creek flows mostly in a natural creek bed open to the sun and air, which helps reduce bacteria levels. Johns Creek flows through many pipes and culverts, only in open air as it nears Coulon Park.
So to keep our swim beach open, businesses and residents in Renton Highlands, the Landing, Paccar, Southport and parts of North Renton should help keep our street gutters clean and spread the word that whatever flows into storm drains can flow right into the Coulon Beach Swim area.
The following photos and maps give more information about this little-known creek and the plans in place to improve it.
Renton is increasing the price of small airplane tie-down spaces (front) by 74% this year. Rent for the T-hangars (back) is increasing by 42%. New rates are effective June 1st.
A statue of Clayton Scott, one of the Northwest’s great aviators who used to fly out of Renton, greets visitors to Renton’s Clayton Scott Field. Clayton Scott was inspired to fly in his youth after seeing the first barnstormers, and Renton’s Clayton Scott Field honors his love of aviation and spirit of discovery. Young people today are finding it increasingly expensive and difficult to follow in his footsteps.
In previous posts I’ve expressed concern that Renton Airport is pushing out propeller aircraft and ushering in more private jets in their place. In so doing, Renton Airport Management is making the airport less accessible for Renton residents, and losing sight of our community’s aviation goals as codified in our Renton Airport Sustainability Management Plan. It may not be long before Renton airport becomes an asset for Seattle and Eastside tech billionaires, while residents of Renton won’t be able to afford to use it. And every time Renton replaces a group of prop airplanes with another business jet we inch closer to having to extend the airport into the $500 million high school that is currently in planning.
This year’s rent increases of 74% for small airplane tie-down spaces and 42% for small T-hangars increases this concern. Renton’s tie-down rates will leapfrog those at Boeing Field; the new tie down rates for small airplanes will be a 33% more expensive at Renton Airport than at Boeing Field, even though Boeing Field offers two runways, a longer runway, and more services.
Airport Management has stated that these rent increases are needed to sustain the airport, but that is arguably because they have been driving out popular small airplane businesses like “the Landing Gear Works” and “Rainier Flight Services,” that were renting numerous facilities that are now vacant.
Some might say that anyone who is rich enough to afford an airplane can afford these rates, but that is not a clear picture of who is being impacted. Some of these airplanes are owned by Renton working people (or frequently several of them banding together) who maintain an airplane in order to advance their flight careers, commute to someplace remote, or fulfill important life goals; the large rent increase will impact them. As small airplane owners give up on Renton’s rates, private jet operators will rapidly move in to take over their real estate, and these jets will not be owned by Renton residents.
If we stay on this course, Renton will soon have the costs and negative impacts of running an airport, without the opportunity for Renton’s residents to use it ourselves.
Renton City Council has ultimate responsibility for airport leases, and anyone who wants to express concern about these increases should contact the council. Please see my post here regarding how to reach them.
Starting June 1st, small airplane tie-downs will cost $185.60 per month, and T-hangers will cost $580 per month (excerpt from Renton’s 2025-2026 Fee Schedule)In 2023-2024, small airplane tie-downs were $106.43 per month, and T-hangers were $409.43 per month (excerpt from Renton’s 2023-2024 Fee Schedule)Boeing Field tie-down rates of $124 per month are only 67% of what Renton will soon be chargingChart from Airport Director’s Report at May 13 RAAC meeting
The School District is rushing its application to demolish homes on the newly acquired property near Renton High School. They’re in such a hurry they have not even formally halted a six-year project that was about to build thirty new apartments on Airport Way in the “Dreamliner” project (where they now plan to move the baseball field). The project board for the School District’s demolition plan is now posted next to the project board for the Dreamliner.The Dreamliner Apartment Project has been in the formal approval and permitting process since 2018, and was soon to bring 30 desperately-needed new apartments to Airport Way. But the School District recently purchased this property under threat of eminent domain, and plans to include this property in their relocated baseball field. They’ve also taken 32 houses and 8 businesses for this purpose.
But none of these important public process elements appear to be slowing down the School District in tearing down the checker-board of homes and businesses they’ve been able to acquire, in an effort that some people feel is intended to make it impossible to save the neighborhood while lowering the value of properties that the District has not purchased yet.
Even worse, the immediate tearing down of the homes before the project is formally approved is an end-run around the recently approved Houston Eminent Domain Fairness Act, which was passed unanimously this year by the legislature to assure that if property taken by a school district is not used for its intended purpose it will be sold back to the original owners. How can it be sold back if it is destroyed?
By tearing down the homes they acquire under threat of eminent domain they eliminate the possibility of having to sell them back if their plans are not approved.
Big public projects like a new high school require years of planning and approvals, and any number of steps could cause the project to go sideways. This is especially true at the end of an airport, in an archeological sensitive area, near a salmon-bearing river, with a shallow water-table. The School District themselves acknowledge that the building won’t be complete for about five more years, and that’s IF everything goes according to plan.
The current Renton High School is shown outlined in red. It sits at the confluence of the original Cedar River and the extinct Black River, the historic outlet of Lake Washington. Every salmon spawning in Lake Washington or its tributaries, or Cedar River or its tributaries, passed through this area until 1917 when the Ballard Locks were opened. This site was cherished by indigenous residents for fishing and living for time immemorial. The property now being acquired by the School District includes the historic Cedar River bed and northern shore, and contains significant artifacts that should only be uncovered by trained archeologists. Heavy machinery use will be limited.
Under these circumstances the right thing to have done would have been to leave the neighborhood intact until construction is near, by either buying options on the properties or purchasing them outright and renting them back to the owners. Purchasing them and tearing them down immediately, before they have an approved plan, unreasonably forces the hands of decision-makers downstream in the process and violates the spirit of proper public planning.
Out to bid; Renton School District is inviting bids to tear down some homes in the neighborhood while others are still contesting the eminent domain taking through the courts
Renton Resident Angie Laulainen spoke at last night’s Renton City Council Meeting on this topic, and she provided me a copy of her speaking notes. I’ve included then below the cut:
Renton Resident Angie Laulainen speaks to Renton City Council on May 12, 2025
Screenshot from Social Media video showing broken office furnishings and mechanical equipment that had been tossed onto Park Avenue, apparently from six stories up
Just two weeks ago a teen in Colorado was convicted of murder for throwing a rock which punctured a car windshield and killed the driver. Thrown objects from Renton’s derelict Park Avenue buildings could readily cause a similar death.
Four months after Renton’s Public Safety Chair assured the public that she was taking the safety of of the Park Avenue buildings very seriously, a social media post now shows evidence of office furniture being hurled from the taller of the two buildings onto Park Avenue below.
This is not the first time that objects have been thrown from high up in this building, but I have not previously seen photographic evidence of objects being thrown into the traffic lanes.
Renton’s Public Safety Chair, Carmen Rivera, shared an entry on several social media sites on January 13 stating “We remain committed to ensuring the property is secured and that we can move toward a resolution that benefits the community.” In the same post she assured the public the property would be secured and patrolled.
A month later, I documented here that the property had not in fact been adequately secured. Please see that post for complete background on this topic.
These buildings are desperately out of compliance, and the City of Renton has every right to go onto the property and physically abate them, and bill the out-of-state ownership group for the cost. To meet code, the deathtrap buildings need to be emptied of occupants, and all doors and windows secured with either the originally designed glazing or architectural panels that match the building. Cleanup should occur around the buildings to eliminate blight. The buildings should then be surveilled, with electronic means and perhaps an occupant residing in a trailer onsight, until the buildings can demolished per an approved permit. I would also like to see water service restored to the buildings, with at least temporary fire protective equipment, so that the open-elevator-shaft, waterless building does not turn into an inferno that threatens our entire city.
If the City had conducted emergency physical abatement when many of us had first recommended it, these buildings could still be valuable and serviceable, and could continue to support thousands of jobs in Renton.
Broken windows and graffiti are found on all sides of the buildings
A trellis for invasive plants? This rusting tower and others like it on Sunset Blvd NE perform no useful function. The electric wires were removed years ago, and the towers are just abandoned and disintegrating in place.
It’s way past time for the Electric Utility to remove the derelict power line towers on Sunset. Our views in Renton are cluttered enough by power lines, that we don’t need a bunch of additional rusting towers adding their own blight.
I took these photos two years ago, and the scene is no different today (other than a little more weed growth and more rust. )
This power line was abandoned and replaced by a new run many years ago, but the retired power lines were initially left in place. Several years ago copper thieves began climbing the towers and stealing the wire, so as a safety measure the power company removed the rest of the wire.
I assumed they would eventually apply for demolition permits to remove the ugly, unnecessary towers, but that has not happened. I’ve expressed my displeasure to our local utilities in the past that they never seem to prioritize maintaining the appearance of their easements in Renton. This is just one example of it.
I don’t remember whether these were owned by PSE or Seattle City Light, but in either case the City of Renton should lean on them to take them down and clean up this easement.
You may have to look closely to realize there are no wires going to this large electrical truss tower that pointlessly interferes with views in the Windsor Hills neighborhood.
The abandoned towers are in the greenbelt between I-405 and Sunset Blvd NEHimalayan Blackberry, english Ivy, and other invasive plant species climb the rusting structures, spreading seeds through wind and birds to nearby homes.The two towers shown are the closest to the street. There are several other abandoned towers in the greenbelt to the north of these.
Renton School District is wielding the public’s authority when taking properties for their new Renton High baseball field, so the public deserves a thorough understanding of what Renton is losing in the process.
This post features the stunning landscape in just the latest one of the 32 homes being taken for this project, which calls for this garden to be leveled and covered with artificial turf or asphalt.
Regardless of where anyone stands on the tradeoff of a ball-field vs private homes, they should admire, respect, and grieve the stately trees, stunning foliage, and wildlife that Renton is losing in this project.
Catherine Ploue-Smith, has owned and meticulously cared for this property across from Renton High School for decades, while raising her family and immersing herself in our Renton community. She enjoys downtown living, and she told me this home has always felt like an oasis in the city to her and her family. She was born in France, and I can see french “country garden” influence in her beautiful landscape.
Renton is a “Tree City,” and we should expect our School District to at least replace her magnificent trees if the trees can’t somehow be saved (which is unlikely since they appear to be in a baseball field in the current school plan.)
Sweltering summer temperatures in Renton’s downtown can already climb 10 degrees hotter than in Renton’s tree-covered neighborhoods in the surrounding hills. Replacing more downtown trees with asphalt or artificial turf will increase the heat island effect.
For decades the homes, businesses, and landscaping on Tobin and Airport Way have been the only buffer between Renton High School and 170 acres of asphalt, concrete, and jet blasts at Renton Airport. Flattening homes and gardens like this one, so that the High School will be adjacent to the airport, does not seem like an improvement. And with increasing jet traffic at Renton Airport, conflicts between the airport and High School needs are only going to get worse.
Renton residents expressed deep concerns regarding the Board’s proposed elimination of school librarians and other key staff, while they simultaneously spend tens of millions of dollars taking homes and businesses by threat of eminent domain to adjust Renton High School’s footprint.
The zoom portion of the meeting was recorded, and the audio is good quality. I’ve included it in this post. Unfortunately, the visual part of the recording only includes a thumbnail-size video of the Board Chambers, and does not include the speaker’s podium during audience comment. But this does not interfere with understanding the commentary.
There were two sessions of audience comment. I’ve included both of them in their original audio, and in an AppleNotes “voice-to-text” transcription. The voice-to-text is imperfect, and I apologize to the speakers that I don’t have time to go through and correct all the errors. It is useful for helping those of you reading to quickly see what was covered, and you can listen to the video for an accurate record.
Here is the first period of audience comment from the zoom video, including the first ten comments:
Here is the second period of audience comments from the zoom video:
A blow-up of the thumbnail video showing Renton’s school superintendent (on left) and all board members were present.
And then, below the cut is the automated transcript of the audience comment. Again, my apologies for the electronic transcription errors…please listen to the videos for the official record.
This image from google earth shows Renton High School’s baseball fields and the airport runway
Renton High School currently has four baseball diamonds, and two of them are in the Runway Protection Zone. Per FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190-4B , 2.2.5.1 “the purpose of the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) is to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground.” The FAA would discourage construction of these baseball diamonds today. But the baseball diamonds have been in use since before FAA’s current land-use policy was in place, so they are considered “pre-existing” or “grandfathered” under regulatory guidance.
This screenshot from the 2022 Renton Airport Layout Plan shows that the northern two baseball fields are in the “Departure Runway Protection Zone”In this schematic of the revised High School layout, the architect depicts an “EXISTING TRACK” in the Departure Runway Protection Zone. This track is not actually existing, and would likely constitute a new use with a new concentration of people. It may not actually be allowed per Renton’s commitments to FAA. This would mean no space was gained by moving the ballfields.Closeup showing the “Existing Track” that does not existThe baseball field as shown on Google Maps today
With the relocation of these baseball diamonds into the current Tobin neighborhood, the School District is proposing to change the use of the property in the Runway Protection Zone to a high school sports track. I question whether this new use meets FAA guidelines. And unlike the existing baseball diamonds, the sports track can not be said to have been approved long ago, before current FAA regulations. Instead, it requires that professional engineers approve it in 2025, with concurrence of city permitting authorities who have responsibility for safety and to FAA.
Everytime Renton Airport accepts federal grants, the city commits to grant assurances which promise that Renton “will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft.”
As a new use in the Runway Protection Zone, the new sports track must be evaluated as to whether it would draw an assembly of people, and how densely populated this assembly could possibly be in the event of an airplane accident at this location.
“2.2.6.1 The number of people concentrated in an area near an airport is the land use characteristic tied most closely to the consequences of aircraft accidents. The most direct method of reducing the potential severity of an aircraft accident to the people and property in proximity to an airport is to limit the maximum number of structures and/or people in areas close to an airport.”
“2.2.6.5 In general, the lower the density, the greater the level of compatibility a use will have with aircraft operations. An airport and the local community should evaluate density near an airport…. the goal would be to require any ensuing development to be at or below the current levels. This essentially focuses on making the current situation no worse. “
Foot races during PE class might be a relatively low density with just 20-30 students on the track. But a competitive track-meet could be very high density, attracting hundreds of people, with spectators on the infield and around the perimeter of the track.
And if the track surrounds a new soccer field, as most do, where spectators typically set up tents and chairs along the side lines, the density of people in the Runway Protection Zone could frequently exceed what is currently seen on the baseball diamonds.
The baseball fields as they exist today have movable soccer goals, but these are located in the southern half of the field, outside of of the Runway Protection Zone, in an area proposed to be converted to parking with the new high school.
For some reason the new high school design approved by the board shows an “existing track” at the location, but there is no track in existence– only baseball fields.
The review and final approval of the details will not come from the FAA themselves, but must come from the Renton School District (as project designer and applicant) and the City of Renton. The City of Renton has final say as both the permitting authority and the airport sponsor. While the FAA won’t specifically make the determination about the compatibility of the use, they will determine whether the City of Renton has used an acceptable process to determine compatibility. If Renton has not, then the city’s ability to receive FAA grants will be in jeopardy, which would put our city’s finances and businesses in jeopardy. In the event of a catastrophe in a crowded gathering, Renton’s current City and School District elected officials will own many of the decisions that led up to it.
First two rows of table in AC 150/5190-4B. FAA expects elected officials who sponsor airports to become familiar with, and uphold, airport safety guidance. Per the AC: “Coordination and communication between elected and appointed officials and airport sponsors is vital to effectively implement and enforce land use compatibility initiatives because most land use decisions are vested with local governments.”
In summary, the baseball fields could continue to be used at their current locations since they are preexisting. If they get moved to a new location, it is questionable whether any high school sports facilities could be built at their current locations without potentially worsening the safety risks and possibly violating airport grant assurances.
In the end, Renton School District may find they forcibly cleared an entire city neighborhood and ended up with no more sports facilities than they have now.
At the last School Board Meeting, a School Board Member mentioned an episode in which a light plane made an emergency landing in the baseball field right after take-off from Renton Airport. This was indeed a dangerous incident, and the fixed base operator associated with the incident was asked to leave Renton Airport a short time later. But this risk is not in any way lessened by changing the baseball field into a running track and soccer field. It is very likely made worse.
The most effective way to limit the airplane risk to Renton High Students would have been to move the high school, as voters approved in the 2022 ballot issue. Institutional uses, which include high schools, are the FAA’s least favorite uses in the danger zones around runways.
The second-best way to limit the risk would be to minimize jet traffic on Renton Airport, as Renton’s 5,300-foot runway is very short for jets landing and taking off at 140 miles per hour, and the risk increases with the number of operations. But our current Airport Management seems to be eliminating piston-engine aircraft and encouraging more jets at Renton Airport.
Residents and taxpayers may have to pick up the pieces as Renton School District and Renton Airport continue their headlong collision into one another.
A small plane flies over one of the Renton High’s two baseball diamonds in the Runway Protection ZoneThe current Renton High School Baseball field includes three baseball diamonds and portable soccer goals. This field is proposed to be redeveloped into a parking lot and an “Existing Track,” even though no track exists in this area.This entire $500,000,000 project (which eliminates 32 homes and 8 businesses) is being done because the Renton School Board does not feel like the strikingly beautiful, historic Renton High Building is good enough for a high school, even after tens of millions of dollars of remodeling have been done to it in recent years.The FAA discourages institutional uses, including high schools, in proximity of an airport per this Advisory Circular
“Number of people concentrated in an area near an airport is the land use characteristic tied most closely to the consequences of aircraft accidents” according to AC 150/5190-4B
Parks and Rec facilities discussed in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190-4B FAA guidance from FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190-4B on typical number of people per acre in different uses. Lower is better. A two-acre baseball field with 18 players and ten spectators could come in at the low end, but a sports tournament with hundreds of spectators could come in at the high end.
Longtime S. Tobin Street resident Catherine Ploue-Smith (right) offers numerous reasons that the Renton School Board should not be taking her house by eminent domain; Board Member Pam Teal looks on
Last night the Renton School Board voted 4-0 to continue their condemnation efforts near Renton High School.
As I described in yesterday’s post, the Renton School Board held a special meeting last night to continue their taking of private homes to expand their Renton High School playfield site. (Please see yesterday’s post for full background, with links, on this topic)
Board Members began yesterday’s meeting by asking a few basic questions of Matt Feldmeyer, the District’s Executive Director of Capitol Construction and Planning who is leading the design of the project. One of the questions was whether any of the furniture could be saved in Renton High’s brand new $11.5 million science center that the District just completed last year and now plans to demolish. Mr. Feldmeyer said yes, some of the furniture could probably be repurposed. Board members seemed happy with this answer, as if saving $100,000 in furnishings would somehow make tearing down a new $11.5 building acceptable.
They also asked whether Renton High School sometimes shares their nearby Renton Memorial Stadium with other schools, and Mr. Feldmeyer said they do; based on their reaction, this seemed to be justification to the board that Renton High needed a second football field.
Several residents then testified, offering alternatives to condemnation and other baseball field locations. They also challenged the assumption that Renton High needs a second football field just because they sometimes share their large and well-equipped Memorial Stadium, noting the Memorial Stadium was built for Renton High, and many schools sometimes share facilities (The stadium sits on 17 acres, and has 5,500 covered seats, an electronic scoreboard, a pressbox, concessions, and an all-weather surface). Residents asked the Board to take time to review the many options they have submitted before proceeding. They also itemized many other related concerns.
North Renton Resident Meredith Farmer (who is also the North Renton Neighborhood President but was not speaking in that capacity), gave detailed testimony and closed by asking the Board Members an important question: “If this was your house, would you vote to condemn?”
Catherine Ploue-Smith, a S. Tobin resident who has lovingly maintained her beautiful home and gardens for about 20 years, gave many reasons she and her neighbors should be allowed to keep their homes.
She said the District had just completed the above-mentioned major remodel of the science building, and residents would continue paying taxes for decades to pay off the $11.5 million in bonds for the demolished center.
She also pointed out that the District is not properly maintaining the properties they have already acquired, in many cases leaving them deteriorating with boarded-up windows. These properties are likely to continue being a blight for months or years, as much permit process lies ahead for the project. These properties run down the neighborhood and city, and the haphazard unpainted plywood window-coverings are not allowed by Renton code. (Renton code requires either uncovered windows or painted architectural panels on vacant buildings).
Renton School District is breaking Renton’s ordinances when leaving houses in this boarded up, deteriorating condition. It’s also not fair to those nearby homeowners that are having their homes appraised.
She also felt that the Board was losing sight of how much money they were actually spending in bonds, noting that the last few bonds added together amounted to over a billion dollars, and there was still much unmet need in the district.
Partway through Ms. Ploue-Smith’s thorough testimony I began video recording, and I have provided the video below.
Following about 15-20 minutes of public testimony, the board deliberated for about seven minutes. Part of the brief deliberations included a back-and-forth with a member of the public about whether they would publically read the letters and correspondence they had received, and the Board President said they would not. One Board member mentioned that an airplane once landed on Renton High’s ballfield in the 1990s, but no one explained how redeveloping the baseball field into a soccer field and track (the current plan) would prevent this risk. (I video-recorded the deliberations and provide a link below.)
The Board then voted 4-0 (with one member absent) to proceed with condemning the latest home in the process, 402 S. Tobin Street.
Renton’s School Superintendent (left) and four School Board members watch aa a concerned resident asks them to reconsider taking private property for a new baseball field and reminding them that the bond issue was supposed to pay for a swimming pool for Renton High (which has now been dropped).
In the clip below, S. Tobin Street resident Catherine Ploue-Smith is partway through her testimony encouraging the school board not to take her and her neighbor’s homes for a relocated baseball field. The clip begins with her discussing the 11.5 million dollar Renton High science center that was completed last year and will be demolished for a parking lot.
The clip below is the full deliberations of the Renton School Board (April 24, 2025) as they choose to authorize the latest eminent domain action, the taking of 402 S. Tobin Street.
The latest home being targeted by eminent domain in the meeting. The house will be leveled, along with many others on the block, to relocate the high school baseball field.
If you share my view that this fountain should be cleaned, maintained, and preserved you can let the Mayor and Council know by emailing mayor@rentonwa.gov and council@rentonwa.gov.
