Renton Municipal Code:
“301.3.11.1 Abatement: A building or structure accessory thereto that remains vacant and open to entry after the required compliance date is found and declared to be a public nuisance. The code official is hereby authorized to summarily abate the violation by closing the building to unauthorized entry. The costs of abatement shall be a lien against the real property and may be collected from the owner in the manner provided by law.”
I wish Renton’s top officials would read the Renton Municipal Code. It may take them a few weeks, but it will dramatically help them better understand their options when faced with problems.
This week’s Renton Reporter quotes our Mayor as saying (incorrectly) that the city had two choices for dealing with the abandoned Park Avenue buildings; buying the buildings, or just waiting years for the owners to do something.
But there was always a third option, the best one, that is perfectly clear in Renton’s Code: correcting the nuisance and billing the owner. I’ve been advocating for this option all along. This option would have saved these buildings, giving the owners an asset worth about $30 million dollars in today’s market, and saving North Renton from years of blight and crime.
By ignoring this preferred option, Renton achieved the following outcomes: the buildings are now in ruin; threats from fire, falling and other hazards grow worse by the day; the demolition permit, if it’s ever used, will leave a hazardous and unusable parking garage in place; barbed wire will soon frame the blighted site; the building ownership appears to be in a state of stalled foreclosure; and the process to get back to a healthy occupancy of this space might require environmental cleanup costs (per the Mayor’s estimate) in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Since the land value is assessed at $7 million, no one will want to spend $100 million cleaning it.
The Mayor is also quoted in the Renton Reporter as holding back on fines, even though the city regularly threatens residents with prompt $100-per-day fines for minor issues like not mowing grass or not scrubbing someone else’s graffiti off their fence. Regarding the Southern California firm that owns the deathtrap Park Avenue buildings, the Mayor is quoted as saying the city was “not fining them because we don’t normally fine businesses that in good faith are going to be building in Renton.”
If reading through Renton’s code was too hard, Renton’s leaders could have done a 30-second google search to get the advice from an organization that Renton helps fund just for such guidance, the Municipal Research Service Center. The MRSC suggests immediate repair of hazards by the city followed by billing the owner, and does not discuss buying the offending building as the Mayor suggested.
The City should still act to abate the hazards in this building before someone gets seriously injured or killed, although the City has already squandered the opportunity to save stakeholders tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. And the next time one of these buildings goes vacant, Renton leaders should treat our ordinances as the law, and not a “pirate code” that can be arbitrarily altered at will.
_________________________________________________
The MRSC guidance, Mayor’s full quotes, and the City’s Property Maintenance Code are all shown below, for reference. (Background on these buildings can be found here.)









If you share my view that this fountain should be cleaned, maintained, and preserved you can let the Mayor and Council know by emailing mayor@rentonwa.gov and council@rentonwa.gov.






























Recent Comments