Renton’s light-plane component manufacturer, the Landing Gear Works, challenges eviction from Renton airport

Sofia Farret carefully prepares landing gear kits for shipping to customers. She also performs other critical aviation roles at Landing Gear Works. Ms. Farret has spoken to Renton City Council twice, including this past Monday night, asking for help in settling the lease issue.

 

Renton Airport management and The Landing Gear Works are engaged in a landlord-tenant dispute that’s made its way up to the Renton Council, dominating Monday’s audience comment period.  Eight aerospace workers could lose their jobs, and they were asking for Council help.  Council Members seemed to want to help, but have been reluctant to engage directly with Landing Gear Works.

Renton airport management is frustrated with Landing Gear Work’s claim that the company repaired their roof in lieu of rent payments.  Airport management asserts the roof was Landing Gear Works’ responsibility under the lease.

Landing Gear Works company founder Tom Anderson asked Council for help in settling the lease disagreement at Monday’s council meeting.  He said his offer included his providing “good faith funds.”

 

The president of Landing Gear Works, Tom Anderson, said the city only made the roof his responsibility a few years ago through unfair pressure, and he doesn’t understand how the city would expect him to install a new roof and make other long-term upgrades to a building when he can only get a one or two year lease.  He says he’s been trying to settle these issues for months, including making payments if they won’t accept his repair receipts, but the airport office has been uncommunicative.  He points out the Renton airport is on their third airport director in three years, and recently had no director for several months after the previous director attempted to manage our airport from his home in Utah.

My opinion is that Council Transportation Committee should meet face-to-face with Landing Gear Works and see if an agreement can be worked out before going down the expensive path of litigation.  Under RCW 35A.11.020, Renton City Council has ultimate leasing responsibility for Renton Airport, and past councils have engaged in these discussions with tenants when necessary. I recommend Council not go down the eviction path until they’ve personally tried to work this out.

Recent councils have not experienced many landlord-tenant disputes at Renton airport, thanks primarily to the long, productive tenure of a former Renton airport manager who worked closely with all airport tenants, and ensured there were regular monthly meetings of an empowered Renton Airport Advisory Committee (RAAC). The RAAC combined the perspectives of airport users and representatives from Renton’s neighborhoods to build a thriving, compatible airport community, and they addressed tenant issues like roof maintenance productively and early. In my early days on council, Prior to formation of the RAAC, up to 25 percent of my council time was spent handling airport landlord-tenant disputes.  Recently, frequent changes in airport management and infrequent RAAC meetings are bringing back landlord-tenant tensions at the airport.

Sergio Nunez, a ten-year employee of Landing Gear Works, asks the Council to help save his company.

 

Background on Landing Gear Works:

For 11 years Mr. Anderson and his company “The Landing Gear Works” have designed and built specialized light plane landing gear at Renton Airport.  Mr. Anderson pointed out at the Monday meeting that he has deep roots in Renton; his Dad ran a Machine shop in Renton dating back to 1947.

The Landing Gear Works’ most popular product is a titanium landing gear system for Cessna 180 and 185 aircraft.  These specialized landing gear are lighter weight and less susceptible to corrosion than alternatives, and are sought after world-wide by Cessna owners seeking improved performance and durability. They are not available from anyone else.

On a typical day, the Landing Gear Works will have two or three customer aircraft on-site receiving new gear, and will ship out additional landing gear sets to repair stations around the globe.

The products are made entirely in Renton, with major components fabricated in their  airport workshop and other components coming from machine shops throughout Renton.

The shiny Cessna 180 titanium landing gear strut in front, available only from Landing Gear Works, weighs half as much as the approved steel strut behind it, and it is less susceptible to corrosion. The titanium gear reduces an airplane’s weight by 23 pounds, extending it’s range, adding cargo capacity, and reducing its carbon footprint. These are made in Renton.

 

The Landing Gear Works must maintain key approvals from the FAA to sell these products.  The FAA has issued Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) approving the design, and Parts Manufacturer Approvals (PMAs) authorizing the manufacturing.  Both of these approvals have to be rigorously maintained by Landing Gear Works, by showing they maintain high quality manufacturing processes and that their engineering team is responsive to in-service incidents involving their products.  They have an FAA “continuing airworthiness” responsibility to care for the design, manufacture, and use of these products, as long as they are in service on airplanes.

One continuing airworthiness obligation is maintaining an approved spare parts supply. Needed parts must be readily shipped to anyone with an airplane on ground. FAA enforces this requirement to keep the world’s aircraft flying safely, and eliminate any temptation to use unauthorized parts in repairs.

An eviction of an STC and PMA holder (such as Landing Gear Works) with a mere thirty days notice is incompatible with meeting these Federal regulations and expectations.  Ninety days for a move should ordinarily be considered a bare minimum, and more time would be better.

The Landing Gear Works maintains FAA-approved spares, manufactured in Renton, that can be quickly exported around the world to meet their continuing airworthiness requirements.

 

The Historic Building:

Landing Gear Works’ engineering and manufacturing takes place in a historic building at Renton airport.  The “Old Tower Building” was built in 1943, and provided air traffic control when Renton was building up to one hundred and sixty B-29 superfortresses per month during WWII.  Later, the building served as the Engineering Liaison office for Boeing’s flight line.

The Landing Gear Works occupies the old Renton Control Tower building, built in 1943.
The view from Renton’s historic old control tower, looking over the Boeing flight line today. The black and white photo shows the view when Renton was producing 160 B-29 Superfortresses each month during WWII.
The Landing Gear Works building still contains reminders of it’s long service for the Boeing Company. While at Boeing I personally spent long days and some overnights in this building as I worked with flightline “Liaison” engineers making adjustments to airplanes prior to first flight.

 

When Boeing gave up their lease on the building and turned it back to Renton, we searched for an appropriate aviation use that could occupy the building.  The building does not have any hangar space and is designated in the FAA approved airport layout plan as “Aircraft Manufacturing.”

I remember  when our long-serving airport manager enthusiastically announced he found the right company, with Renton roots and a high-end product.  Landing Gear Works was to occupy most of the building, with the exception of the historic tower and some of the offices below the tower. At that time the city maintained the exterior of the building, including cutting the grass, picking up debris, and keeping the roof repaired. The airport manager also helped Landing Gear Works sublease three hangar spaces to install their equipment on aircraft.

Renton’s 2017 FAA-approved Airport Layout Plan available here,  showed Building 36 (the old tower building) approved for for Aircraft Manufacturing (in green), which Landing Gear Works uses it for. Non-manufacturing use, general aviation, or non-aviation use would not be per plan.

 

 

The Landing Gear Works operated in smooth partnership with Renton for many years.  The recent dispute took root when a later airport manager condemned the hangars used by Landing Gear Works and scheduled them for demolition, and insisted that Landing Gear Works must agree to rent the entire old tower building under a one-to-two year lease if they desired replacement hangar space.

Mr. Anderson says the city then stopped doing any repairs or upgrades to the building, asserting it had become solely a tenant responsibility. The roof began to leak in several locations, and a rusted AC unit broke from a wall in a storm and let water damage an office. The roof appears to be one or two decades past its design life, and is now subsisting only from frequent patching.

Normally, if the city expects a tenant to pay for long-term upgrades to a building, such as a new roof or HVAC system, the city will extend a lease for a long enough period that the cost of the upgrades can be amortized over many years.  As a Council Member, I often helped negotiate these time frames, to ensure our tenants could amortize their improvements.  That was apparently not done in this case.  Landing Gear Works began to use a large percentage of their profits making short-term repairs to their building, not able to fund major upgrades without a long-term lease.

One of many manufacturing rooms. The large building comprises a compact factory, filled with carefully calibrated mills, presses, lathes and other machine tools that are used in manufacturing landing gear. Thirty days notice to move the FAA-approved operation is not respectful of the rigorous care and planning required for such a move.

 

The future for the historic Old Tower Building:

The Airport Layout Plan was updated in 2022.  While the latest version is not yet on the City Website, I have included it below.  The new layout plan shows that the historic old tower building along with several other buildings may eventually be demolished, and replaced with new hangars and offices.  Ideally, new airport buildings would front the perimeter fence, so customers could visit a building without going onto the air side of the security fence. The layout plan shows such a configuration.

In the 2022 Airport Layout Plan, purple cross-hatched buildings including old tower building are designated for possible future removal, to be replaced by new hangar/workshop/office buildings shown in red along perimeter fence. Light blue area would get a revised taxiway.

 

Implementing this plan will require extensive coordination with leaseholders and other stakeholders to protect everyone’s interests. It will require a request for proposals, public review of options, planning, permitting, and FAA approval.  Hopefully this plan will also include coordination with the Renton Historical Society and building architects, who should consider saving the historic tower cab and incorporating it into one of the new replacement hangars.

Finding an aviation tenant for a leaking office building that is planned for demolition will be difficult, and it’s possible the city could go months or years without income from this building.  We can look a half mile east to the former Boeing Buildings on Park Avenue to see how poorly buildings can fare after a period without tenants.  Unfortunately a recent airport break-in shows that the even the airport perimeter fence is not enough to stop intrusions on the airport.

I think Council and Landing Gear Works should sit down together and attempt to sort this out. If a settlement can be reached for Landing Gear Works to catch up on rent, with a possible allowance for continuing to nurse-along the aging roof,  it would make sense to keep them in the building until demolition is near.  If demolition will not happen for ten or more years, then a long-term lease that allows Landing Gear Works to install and amortize a new roof would make sense.

New titanium gear installed. (This photo is from The Landing Gear Works website)

 

State House just passed Initiative 2113 on a 77-20 vote, restoring Police Pursuit Authority!

Breaking news update! Please see my previous blog entry for background.

The State House just passed the Police Pursuit Initiative 77-20, which will restore police pursuit policy generally back to pre-pandemic levels in 90 days.  This will be a big step forward in preventing reckless driving, car thefts, burglaries, and other crimes.

Renton’s two 11th district House Representatives Bergquist and Hackney voted YES on this initiative, splitting with their 11th district Senatorial Colleague Bob Hasegawa who voted NO.

I appreciate Rep. Bergquist’s and Rep. Hackney’s support of this important safety measure.

 

Here is the story in KOMO.

Washington State Senate votes to restore police pursuit authority to pre-pandemic status

After three years of severely limiting police pursuit authority amongst skyrocketing car thefts and highway fatalities, Washington Senate has FINALLY voted to restore police pursuit authority. If the State House does the same thing, our police will once again be able to pursue car thieves, reckless drivers, burglars, and others causing increased mayhem in our cities.

The Senate voted to enact Citizens Initiative 2113.  If the Senate and the House both choose to enact the initiative, then it will become law.  The Governor does not need to sign an initiative adopted by both the House and Senate.  If the House chooses to reject it, then it will go to the voters.

The vote was 36 voting yes, to 13 voting no.  Renton’s own 11th district Senator, Bob Hasegawa,  was amongst the 27 percent voting “no”.

Please encourage our State House Representatives to vote “yes” on this important safety bill and make it law.

Representative Steve Bergquist, Steve.Bergquist@leg.wa.gov

Representative David Hackney, David.Hackney@leg.wa.gov

See my previous blog entry for more background on this topic, including the 500% increase in Renton car thefts that has occured after the police pursuit restrictions went into effect.

More information on review of this initiative in the legislature, including voting and hearing records, can be found here.

21 vehicles stolen in Renton in the past 24 hours; State Legislators must act now

A screenshot of the ValleyCom 911 dispatch log, showing steady Renton Police dispatches for stolen cars this morning

 

Renton cars are being stolen at record rates in Renton. Our Valley Comm dispatch center shows twenty-one vehicles stolen in the past 24 hours.  Many of these cars will be found extensively damaged and abandoned within days, having been used in commission of other crimes. Just one year ago I shared that Renton car thefts had increased 70% from the year prior, reaching 5 per day.  Today’s rate is a 420% increase over that high March 2023 average.

If this rate of vehicle theft were to continue, Renton would see 7665 vehicles stolen in the next year, representing about 10 percent of all our vehicles and $100-150 million dollars in vehicle damages. (This amount of money is approximately three times Renton’s entire annual police budget).  While the victims of the car theft suffer the most in these thefts, all Renton motorists will pay for this damage through higher insurance rates.

Many of these cars will be driven through the doors of local businesses, used in other burglaries and crimes, and driven recklessly through our city.  In most cases, Renton Police have been forbidden to stop them.  Unless officers see certain violent crimes being committed (and burglaries and reckless driving don’t count), the officers can’t pursue these vehicles under the 2021 Washington Police pursuit law.

There are some state legislators that somehow believe that having 21 cars stolen in Renton every night– driven recklessly through our city and crashed into our buildings– has made us safer because we are not put at risk by police chases any more.

As a scientist and engineer, I assure you these legislators are absolutely wrong about this.  Since passing the law in 2021, Washington’s highway fatalities have been skyrocketing to the highest levels in decades, not dropping as these legislators over-simplistically predicted.  Hundreds of additional state residents are being killed annually on our highways since the time the police were banned from pursuing stolen cars.  While other states are getting safer, Washington is getting far more dangerous.

While our fatalities skyrocket, we watch powerlessly as unlicensed juveniles increasingly race stolen cars for fun, and criminals drive any speed they like.  While the limitations on police chases have saved approximately three lives per year in Washington, this small gain is not nearly worth the hundreds of lives lost statewide, and the billions in statewide crime and damages.  Tragically for our next generation, these policies are also teaching some of our youth that crime pays more than going to school and learning job skills, curtailing their opportunities to build the fulfilling, healthy lives we all want for them.

Our State Legislators are reviewing the police pursuit legislation this coming week, and Renton residents are encouraged to let them know how you feel about letting our cars get stolen with impunity.  Also, tell them you want to be safe driving on our roads again, and you are getting tired of seeing the fronts of your favorite business covered in plywood.

You can email your legislators at the following addresses:

Senator Bob Hasegawa, Bob.Hasegawa@leg.wa.gov

Representative Steve Bergquist, Steve.Bergquist@leg.wa.gov

Representative David Hackney, David.Hackney@leg.wa.gov

 

These vehicle thefts all happened within minutes of each other. Valley Comm continuously updates the previous 24-hours of calls on it’s website, in this format.  It’s not possible for readers to sort by call type, so I’ve extracted 24 hours of vehicle theft data in the table below.

 

Below is the extract of auto-theft calls to 911 in the past 24 hours, including the partial address where each vehicle theft was reported.  (Note that there may be others: if a victim filed an online reporting instead of calling 911 to report their car stolen, it would not appear on this list.)

For more information on this topic, including links to additional source data, click here.