My letter to the Editor in Today’s Renton reporter

Dear Editor,

I think it’s important that we get the facts straight on what happened at
the council meeting that spurred Dan Clawson’s frivolous law suit, which
will now cost the taxpayers astronomical amounts of public funds so he can
vent his frustration about a vote that he didn’t like.

The entire issue was being discussed because Master Builders Association,
which represents most of the builders in the region, felt they did not
have adequate input into the new design standards that was about to become law
in Renton.

Marcie Palmer made a suggestion that we postpone our final vote in order
To convene a meeting to address these concerns. Dan Clawson then launched
Into a tirade against Marcie and MBA, which became an argument between Dan,
Terri Briere and myself, when I voiced my concerns about Dan’s abrupt attack on
Marcie and MBA. Before the council could complete its discussion on Marcie’s
request, Dan cut off further debate by forcing a vote on the ordinance, which was then not approved.

This situation reminds me once again of the Highlands meeting, where the
public were shut down from the discussion when they wanted to participate.
What is so wrong about making sure we listen to the people involved before
making law? Isn’t that our job?

While in actuality, the majority of the council approves of the ordinance,
we wanted the concerns raised by MBA to be resolved. Open government
requires open discussion and welcoming input, dissent, and questions from
the council members, the public, and the parties involved in the issue.
Dan forced the council to vote on the ordinance before we could complete
discussion on Marcie Palmer’s request for a little more time before taking
the final vote. Had he not interfered with the simple process of
deliberating over a request, there would have been no forced vote, a
meeting would have been convened and the issue resolved, and a vote taken the
following week or so. What was the rush?

Acting as his own attorney, Clawson is able to file frivolous suits
Without a real financial impact. Renton citizens are already paying an outside
law firm to defend us against his outrageous complaints, which could mount
into hundreds of thousands like the recent case in Shoreline.

I implore Dan Clawson to reconsider his actions and face the facts on his
motivation behind this charade. Renton deserves open government, open
discussion, and council members who respect and appreciate input from
others. Filing suit from political motivations or an angry reaction to a
vote at the cost to our taxpayers is deplorable.

Randy Corman
Renton City Council Position #1

 

A recent post from nojets.org, the group worried about the coorporate jet center

According to nojets.org, Mayor Jesse Tanner tried to keep the airport quiet and neighborly, and we need to keep this focus.



Click to enlarge

Fortunately, the issue will finally be resolved by Boeing leasing the property in question, as long as my council colleagues continue to support this new direction.

For complete history on this issue, CLICK HERE!

This is GREAT NEWS for those of you concerned about Airplane Noise (which is most of you)

Boeing is interested in leasing some property back from Renton, which makes all the discussions about a Jet Center moot.

As far as I am concerned, Boeing is the reason this airport exists, and they are first in line for this site.  From last night’s committee of the whole meeting, it sounds like a majority of my colleagues agree with me.

Let’s welcome Boeing’s increased presence on Renton Airport, and give thanks that we can enjoy the sights and sounds of an occasional and glorious 737 instead of the unknowns of a Corporate Jet Center.

While the process took a long time, we are lucky that we had not started building something new before Boeing decided they wanted this property.  For jobs and revenue, we want Boeing to favor our city for the replacement for the 737 in 10-20 years.  Retail will never provide the kind of payroll and prestige that we get from aerospace…so let’s keep our airplane plant.  And let’s not squeeze Boeing off our airport.


Here is the Seattle Times article:

Boeing tests could halt Renton airport proposal

Seattle Times Eastside bureau

Boeing is considering leasing the space it vacated at Renton Municipal Airport, a move that could dash a controversial proposal to create an executive jet center there.

A Boeing spokeswoman confirmed that the company has asked Renton officials whether the space is available.

Boeing is studying the possibility of testing its group of 737 jets at the Renton Municipal Airport, which is owned by the city but is not a major source of revenue for it.

Renton civic leaders came up with the executive jet center plan a few years ago, anticipating the loss of Boeing and other airport tenants.

After residents of Mercer Island and Renton spoke out against the idea, fearing it would cause too much noise, Renton eased up on the jet center planning process, agreeing to conduct a joint noise study with Mercer Island.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company