Renton considers eliminating local images from city logo, for first time in 60 years

The City of Renton’s current logo, shown above, includes images representing Renton’s significance as the birthplace of commercial jet aviation, the headquarters of the Seattle Seahawks, and the host of one of our region’s key salmon runs.

The City of Renton is considering dumping the images in the City’s logo that set our community apart from others.  At last Monday’s Committee of the Whole Meeting, the Council was presented with a staff proposal to “refresh” and “simplify” the City’s logo.  The proposed new logo would drop the airliner, football, and salmon from the logo.  The new logo would appear as in the picture below.

The proposed new logo removes the Renton-specific icons, and just keeps one of the two generic four-pointed stars in the current logo.

Dropping community-focussed images is a departure from our neighboring cities’ approach, as well as a change to Renton’s approach of the last 60 years.  Below are some logos from nearby cities, including images like a sailboat conjuring Des Moines’ impressive waterfront, a waterfall representing Snoqualmie,  a tree-covered island for Mercer Island, a maple leaf for Maple Valley, and trees and mountains and water images for other cities.

 

Our neighboring cities use icons of waterfalls, trees, sailboats, mountains and even a maple leaf to project their community in their logo.

As a career airplane designer, I feel a special connection to the commercial airliner in Renton’s logo, as it recognizes our city’s importance as the world’s birthplace of commercial jet aviation.  The salmon in the logo acknowledges Renton’s natural environment. and the significance of our Cedar River as home to the largest natural-origin Chinook Salmon run in the Lake Washington Watershed, as well as a key spawning ground for Coho and Sockeye salmon.   The football (which I half expected to soon see paired with a soccer ball) reflects our identity as a headquarters for professional sports, and Renton’s overall support of recreation and entertainment.

This chart shows the evolution o Renton’s logos during the decades. The first Renton-specific icons were added to the logo 60 years ago.
The presentation to City Council justifies the change as a “simplified design.”

The Committee of the Whole briefing is not the final word on this topic.  Before the decision becomes final, the Council has to formally pass legislation implementing the simplified logo.

[Update 2/3] Fortunately, several council members expressed concerns about the proposal, and have so far prevented this staff proposal from advancing.  Ed Prince was very vocally against the logo change, along with Ruth Pérez & James Alberson and Valerie O’Halloran. Two members were absent from the discussion.  The topic has so far not been reported out of committee.

The full details of the proposal can be found here, as well as the staff’s proposed phase-in plan.  Anyone with an opinion on this issue can write to the Council at council@rentonwa.gov, or write to the Mayor at mayor@rentonwa.gov.

More broken promises; dangerous Park Avenue buildings still not secure

An 18-inch gap under the security fence is large enough for adults and children to easily access the dangerous Garden Plaza buildings (often referred to as Park Avenue building). People are also using the retaining wall (on the far right) to step over the barbed wire here.

Every time I’ve driven past the derelict Garden Plaza buildings I’ve easily spotted one or more holes in the security fence.  Everytime these failings are brought to the City’s attention, City leaders insist that permanent repairs by the building’s owner are imminently forthcoming, or an all-new fence is about to be installed that will be far more more impassible and secure than the previous one. But the result is always the same.

The latest barbed-wire-topped fence was the subject of a September Renton Reporter article, in which the Mayor addressed on-going neighborhood concerns about this building. The mayor assured the public the city had issued a firm deadline for construction of this new fence which was supposed to be “unscalable” (the article said “upscalable,” which I assume was a typo.)

I easily spotted the current fence openings from the road.  A large gap at the bottom of the fence near a staircase provides enough room for even an adult to easily slide under; the bare spot in the fallen leaves shows the gap is in use.  For those trespassers that don’t want to slide under, the concrete retaining wall enables intruders to take a large step over the barbed wire above the gap; the sagging barbed wire shows this is happening.

The public has been promised that this property would be secured. The unsecured property full of broken glass,  open drops, and biohazards continues to be a deadly risk to curious children and people seeking shelter.  It’s also a severe fire hazard for the neighborhood, and thrown objects from these buildings have put motorists at risk.

The owners of this property have had years to comply with city requirements. They are making a mockery of Renton’s code enforcement.  Strong code enforcement could have saved these buildings when they first went into disrepair; now we need strong code enforcement to protect human safety.

The code requires all the doors and windows be secured on vacant buildings, with either their original materials or architectural panels that match the building design.  It also requires that fire protection systems be maintained.  The code includes no exceptions or special privileges just because the building might be torn down in the future.  At some point every building will eventually be torn down– but it still has to meet code in the meantime.  If the owners won’t do the work to meet codes, the city  should do the work and bill the owners for it, putting a lien on the property if necessary–which is allowed under the law.

If you want to help you can email the Council and Mayor, and insist that code enforcement be taken seriously on these dangerous and blighted buildings:  Send emails to: council@rentonwa.gov and mayor@rentonwa.gov.

For further background on this property and the relevant codes, click here.

This retaining wall provides an opportunity for intruders to step over the fence at the top of the stairs; the sagging wire shows it is happening.
These buildings are dangerous! No one should be entering this building site without authorization and appropriate protective equipment. Even standing next to the buildings could be deadly due to falling glass and debris.

Noise issues intensify at Renton Airport; Mercer Island increasingly frustrated by overnight jets

The Renton Airport Advisory Committee discusses the increase of nighttime jet traffic over Mercer Island at the Committee’s September 9 meeting.

The Renton Airport Advisory Committee discussed intensifying noise concerns at their third-quarter September 9 meeting, and the link to the zoom recording of the meeting was just made available.  The video can be watched here.

The noise discussion starts at 43 minutes, first with some questions by Jeff Dineen (representing South Renton and RAAC vice-chair) regarding how pilots get trained on noise abatement procedures, followed by an intense discussion of overnight jet traffic over Mercer Island.  Tom Imrich (representing Mercer Island and a highly-experienced commercial jet pilot) makes the case that too many of the takeoffs are occuring at just a few-hundred feet above Mercer Island’s tree-tops at all hours of the night, and that a higher take-off profile or an east-channel (over-water) departure route should be invoked to spare Mercer Island’s neighborhoods from the noise and safety risks of the low-flying jet traffic.

The RAAC discussion covers some of the concerns that precipitated a firm letter from Mercer Island’s Mayor to the Renton Airport Director in September.

The video and draft meeting minutes were made available in conjunction with the announcement for the fourth quarter RAAC meeting, to be held on November 18th at 5:00 PM.  I’ve attached the agenda below.  (Meetings of the RAAC are open to the public, although public comment is typically not taken at the meetings.)

In several previous blog entries I’ve expressed concern that a new focus by Renton Airport leadership on inviting jet centers into Renton Airport, diplacing historic small-parts manufacturers and piston-aircraft users, would lead to increasing conflicts of this type.  All my earlier blog posts related to Renton Airport and the RAAC can be found here, or by clicking “Airport” in the Category sidebar.

 

 

Mary Clymer was raised in an environment of service to Renton

(Standing from left: Tim Schlitzer, Jesse Tanner, Toni Nelson, Randy Corman, Kathy Keolker, Bob Edwards; Seated from left: Mayor Earl Clymer, Dick Stredicke.)

As last-minute voters fill out their ballots for Renton’s caring and talented Mary Clymer (don’t forget!), I thought I would share this photo from when I served with her grandfather Earl Clymer in the mid 1990’s. Earl served 18 years on Council followed by 8 years as Mayor and left a family legacy of service to Renton.

Per the Seattle Times: “As a council member and as mayor, Mr. Clymer was known for his efforts to protect Renton’s aquifer, expand its parks system and senior-citizen services, and attract and retain businesses.”

I’m looking forward to seeing Earl’s granddaughter Mary, who already serves our community in many other ways, carry on Earl’s legacy at Renton City Hall.

Banner from Mary Clymer for Renton website

 

Please remember to return your ballots and vote for Mary Clymer!

From left, me, my wife Cathy, Mary Clymer, and Former Mayor Denis Law at Renton’s Farmers Market

To get the positive, safe future that everyone in Renton deserves, we need a healthy change in Renton Council Position 2.  Mary Clymer is ready to be that change.  Please vote for Mary by Tuesday, November 4th.  She has run a great campaign, and we need to get her across the finish line with a strong voter turnout.  Many people have not voted yet.  Please return your ballots by Tuesday (either postmarked by Tuesday afternoon or dropped in an official ballot collection box before 8:00 PM), and tell your friends to vote for Mary.

Please read more in my July endorsement announcement here.

“This is the end”; The Rock Wood Fired Pizza to close after 16 1/2 years at the Landing

The sad news of the pizzeria closing made me think of The Doors lyric “This is the end, beautiful friend,” from one of the countless classic rock songs that provided ambiance in the Rock Wood Fired Pizza in Renton.  (It’s not completely the end for the Rock, as their Auburn restaurant will remain open.)

In a sneak peek of their artistically-designed restaurant in April 2009, I said the Rock Wood Fired Pizza felt like Hard Rock Cafe meets Pirates of the Caribbean.  I published this blog entry at the time about my excitement for the new Renton restaurant.

I’m saddened to hear this classic-rock-themed restaurant will be closing soon.  It’s been the site of countless gatherings with my family and Boeing colleagues through their long and melodious run at the Landing.

Thank you to the owners and staff of the Rock for all the great food, drinks (buckets of them),  and fun you’ve provided to our community over your 16+ years here in Renton.  We will miss you.

Here is a screenshot of their Facebook post with the news:

Update on demolition of Tobin neighborhood for Renton High baseball field

SB left an update this morning on my post “Not ‘willing sellers’; forty homes and businesses are being taken by use or threat of eminent domain.”  Please click here to read that post for details on this issue.

Here is SB’s Comment:    “And as of yesterday, the minority run businesses on the corner of Airport & Logan have been demolished. More lost local businesses. And the general public drives by, unaware their tax dollars, sucked up by the Renton School District, are being used to ruin the lives of their fellow citizens – instead of to improve the education of students.”

 

Collection agency for Renton’s overdue fines increases residents’ vulnerability to scams

Banner for this month’s mailed City newsletter
An article in this month’s City newsletter announces Linebarger Attorney’s new text message system for collecting past-due fines and court fees.

This month’s “Our Renton” newsletter (delivered in our utility bills) includes a message that I would not have approved if I were on Council: “Please note that any text messaging from Linebarger code 98023 is not a scam.”

Text message origination numbers can be spoofed, and all Renton residents should remain extremely cautious about sending money, filling in passwords, or sending personal information to any link that is text-messaged to them.  It’s erroneous and dangerous to assure residents that a text coming from any specific number is not a scam.  (My son once received a message that came from the official BECU phone number, but was in fact a spoofed account.)

To make matters worse, the subject text messages will not come from the City of Renton,  which has local offices and phone numbers for verifying legitimacy, but instead a Texas-based law firm/ collection agency  that collects delinquent fines and court fees for profit.  This puts the City in the position of trying to convince residents that city payments can be made to an out-of-state entity with a hard-to-remember name, as long as the text message appears to come from a (spoofable) code.

This is a dangerous message. We should all be reminding our vulnerable residents NOT to sign into any website links sent to them via text message or email, unless they are absolutely certain that they know who sent them. And even then it is better to personally navigate to official sites, rather than following links, since a friend’s email can be hacked or spoofed.

The City’s mailer says people can go the rentonwa.gov/court for more information, but very few will.  For those that do, if they navigate through some links they’ll be able to see what a text message from Linebarger Attorneys will look like:

Renton’s website shows that a text message will be of this form, and include a login link where personal information could be entered.  If the information gets entered into a fake website, a scammer would have all they need to shake-down a scam victim.

 

This is an image from the Linebarger website. This could be cloned, with victims directed to the cloned-site via spoof text messages.

The City apparently put this unfortunate message on their website and in their newsletter because Linebarger Attorneys asked them to.  But I think the City should have said “no” to posting Linebarger’s recommended message, and “no” to any text messages that ask Renton residents to follow a text link to remit funds.

In contrast to the City’s message, The National Council on Aging warns readers about the proliferation of text scams and says: “The “don’t click/don’t respond” rule applies even if you recognize the name of the sender (your bank, for example) and think the text message may be real.”

For anyone struggling to pay a fine or court fees, often Renton’s most financially-challenged residents, accidentally paying the fees to a scam artist could be devastating.  But many additional people are impacted by this message, far beyond the people that owe fines.  By advising people that verifying a text came from a certain number makes it safe, the city is putting all our residents in danger of losing enormous amounts of money, potentially their life savings.

And if anyone loses money to someone spoofing Linebarger’s text number, the fact that the city published “please note that any text messaging from Linebarger code 98023 is not a scam”  leaves Renton taxpayers, all of us, vulnerable to covering the losses.

If you suspect you might owe court fines or fees to the City of Renton, you can find a link on the City of Renton website where you can pay them.  (For security do your own search, but at the time of this writing this is the link). You should also typically be contacted by US Postal Service Mail with instructions, and you should phone the City if you are uncertain why you are being asked for money (phone numbers are given on the City website).  Even if a past-due debt has been sent to collections, the City of Renton should still be able to help you verify whether you truly owe it, and help verify that any payments you make are sent to the right place.

Homelessness will skyrocket if surging property tax rates aren’t brought under control

Property taxes on the Garden Plaza buildings on Park Avenue have dropped by almost half a million dollars as the buildings crumble to the ground. The blight is impacting nearby properties, like the new Southport offices, where property taxes have dropped over a million dollars since 2021. This tax burden shifts to homeowners and renters, making housing increasingly unaffordable.
This graph shows the past five years of property taxes on my Renton Highlands home. This data can be easily generated for any property in Renton by using the “King County Tax Transparency Tool.”

Like many other Renton homeowners, I’ve seen my property taxes surge 50% in just four years.  My 1959 one-story home has a tax-assessed value of $1,003,000, just one percent higher than the King County average assessment of $997,538. But the annual taxes are $3,334 higher than they were four years ago. and they’re likely to go much higher.

In 2001 Washington voters, concerned about being taxed out of their homes, approved initiative 747 to put a “1% cap” on the amount a taxing district could increase taxes. But this cap doesn’t apply when voters approve the increase, and (when applicable) the cap only applies to total taxes collected by a jurisdiction, not to individual properties. So some property owners can see big tax increases when other see reductions, even when the jurisdiction holds to a 1% increase overall.  And taxes still go up even when region-wide property values drop. Hence, my 50 percent higher tax bill over four years could become a new pattern, regardless of whether property values go up or down in the future.

What would it look like if this rate of increase was the “new normal”?  If we see 50% increases every four years, the way we have in the past four, this is our 20 year outlook:

My home’s property tax if we continue with 50% growth every four years

At the current rate of growth, in twenty years my home’s property taxes would be almost $80,000 per year, heavily impacting my retirement planning.  People still working would also struggle– few homeowners could pay a mortgage and support a family with an $80,000 property tax payment.  And renters will have the $7000 monthly tax bill added to their rent.

While this looks ridiculous, it could happen if local officials do not relearn the discipline of belt-tightening.  The first step will be to admit they have a problem.

The City of Renton portion of my taxes has gone up 39% in the past four years, from $653 to $905.  In a Q13 Fox report today, Mayor Pavone erroneously told David Rose: “Property taxes have gone up, but it has nothing to do with the City of Renton.”   The Mayor was mistaken. Even with the voter-approved “1% cap” on total annual increases in city property tax collections, residential taxes can go up sharply when taxes drop on business properties like the ruined Park Avenue buildings and the former Red Lion Hotel.  A friend of mine who heard the Mayor’s statement quipped, does that mean we don’t have to pay Renton’s increased  taxes?

By hovering the cursor over the bars on King County’s Tax Transparency tool, one can quickly see the individual contributors to the taxes. My City of Renton property tax was $653 in 2021, the year I retired from City Council.
My City of Renton property tax increased to $905.37 by 2025, a 39% increase in four years.

Taxes across all taxing-districts are rising fast, with no end in sight.  After a new King County Parks bond was approved in last month’s primary,  Renton School District and Valley Medical Center are both asking Renton voters for more money in this November’s general election.  The City of Renton is working on its own Park Bond ballot issue for next year, and Sound Transit feels they are about $30 billion dollars short, and talking about going to the polls for more.  The other taxing districts will not be far behind. Our property tax increases are far out-pacing most people’s wage growth, and if our taxes keep rising at the current pace fewer and fewer people will qualify for home purchases or leases. Many more of our current residents will become unhoused.

It doesn’t have to be this way.  We were able to actually lower city taxes in the past by diligently managing every penny of our tax revenues, and ensuring we maintained a thriving business climate.  Our elected officials must focus on solving problems using the record amounts of money taxpayers are already giving them, not by constantly asking for more.

[Note: updated on September 20 with new second paragraph summarizing state tax structure and “1% cap,” in response to a question by “GoRedhawks!” in the comments ]

Not “willing sellers”; forty homes and businesses are being taken by use or threat of eminent domain

This is one of the 32 homes and 8 businesses that are being taken by Renton School District. None of these were mutual agreements with “willing sellers,” in spite of the School District’s attempts to spin them that way.

[Note: For background on this topic please see my earlier posts on eminent domain here; photos in this story are from Photographer Gary Palmer]

Renton’s School Superintendent, School Board Members, and at least one Renton Council Candidate are all attempting to dismiss the degree of harm done to families near Renton High School by asserting that many of the properties acquired by the School District were “agreements” with “willing sellers.”  This is a falsehood that adds insults to the life-changing injuries that the impacted families are suffering. This falsehood also reveals that those who made the decision to forcibly take these properties are unwilling to own their decision or its consequences.

To the best of my knowledge, none of the 32 homeowners or 8 businesses that are currently losing their property to the Renton High expansion were actively marketing their property for sale on October 25, 2023.  That was the date that Renton School Board directed the superintendent to acquire all 40 properties, using eminent domain as necessary.

Excerpt from Resolution 02-23/24 threatening eminent domain, passed by Renton School District on October 25th, 2023

Every sale of these properties that occured after this date was by definition “under threat of eminent domain,”  and not by agreement with “a willing seller.”  The sellers can no longer be considered “willing” after Resolution 02-23/24 passed, since the District’s course of action compels them to sell.  The School District would have had to complete the purchase before introducing the threat of eminent domain for the seller to truly be considered “willing.”

To put it bluntly, you can’t force someone to do something, and then argue that forcing them was okay because they were “willing.”  Compulsion is the opposite of consent.

Courts and real estate professionals widely understand that anyone under threat of eminent domain is not a willing seller.  With the threat of eminent domain looming over a property it can’t be kept or sold to to a third-party on the free market– it has to be sold to the government.  The seller may ultimately agree on a price with the government to avoid incurring lawyer fees, but that does not make them a “willing seller.”  It’s past time for Renton School District to figure this out.

When Renton School District infamously acquired the Houston family farm in the 1960’s and then sold it for a profit to a developer in the 1980s, they bullied George Houston (who signed with an “X” because he couldn’t read) into signing away his family farm using the threat of eminent domain.  The threat of eminent domain is frequently all the government needs to compel a sale from someone who can’t afford an attorney.  That is why earlier this year, at the urging of George Houston’s son John,  the Washington House and the Washington Senate both unanimously voted to approve Senate Bill 5142, the Houston Eminent Domain Fairness Act; the new law attempts to protect people from being exploited the way the Houston family was by even the threat of eminent domain.

Renton School District has many injustices they need to atone for.  They should begin by recognizing that compulsion to sell by threat of eminent domain is just a more quiet (and often more exploitive) form of an eminent domain taking.

And if you hear anyone say that the properties around Renton High School were sold willingly, please explain to them how they are mistaken.

One of the 32 homes being taken by Renton School District
The popular El Kiosko Restaurant is one of the eight business forced to move by Renton School District eminent domain actions
Another home taken by Renton School District

 

At a recent walk around Renton High School, Counselor/Author John Houston (front-center) shared the story of his parent’s farm being taken in the 1960s by Renton School District. The District used the threat of eminent domain.  Mr. Houston’s engaging and enlightening book covering the impact of this loss to his family, and his personal journey to move past it,  is available here.

Below the cut I have photos of several more of the 32 homes being taken by either threat of eminent domain, or contested eminent domain court actions.

Continue reading →

The Renton Property Maintenance Code applies to businesses too, not just residents

Renton Municipal Code:

“301.3.11.1 Abatement: A building or structure accessory thereto that remains vacant and open to entry after the required compliance date is found and declared to be a public nuisance. The code official is hereby authorized to summarily abate the violation by closing the building to unauthorized entry. The costs of abatement shall be a lien against the real property and may be collected from the owner in the manner provided by law.”

I wish Renton’s top officials would read the Renton Municipal Code.  It may take them a few weeks, but it will dramatically help them better understand their options when faced with problems.

This week’s Renton Reporter quotes our Mayor as saying (incorrectly) that the city had two choices for dealing with the abandoned Park Avenue buildings; buying the buildings, or just waiting years for the owners to do something.

Renton “Garden Plaza” buildings on Park Avenue have fallen into ruin

But there was always a third option, the best one, that is perfectly clear in Renton’s Code: correcting the nuisance and billing the owner.  I’ve been advocating for this option all along.  This option would have saved these buildings, giving the owners an asset worth about $30 million dollars in today’s market, and saving North Renton from years of blight and crime.

By ignoring this preferred option, Renton achieved the following outcomes: the buildings are now in ruin; threats from fire, falling and other hazards grow worse by the day; the demolition permit, if it’s ever used, will leave a hazardous and unusable parking garage in place; barbed wire will soon frame the blighted site; the building ownership appears to be in a state of stalled foreclosure; and the process to get back to a healthy occupancy of this space might require environmental cleanup costs (per the Mayor’s estimate) in the hundreds of millions of dollars.  Since the land value is assessed at $7 million, no one will want to spend $100 million cleaning it.

The Mayor is also quoted in the Renton Reporter as holding back on fines, even though the city regularly threatens residents with prompt $100-per-day fines for minor issues like not mowing grass or not scrubbing someone else’s graffiti off their fence.  Regarding the Southern California firm that owns the deathtrap Park Avenue buildings, the Mayor is quoted as saying the city was “not fining them because we don’t normally fine businesses that in good faith are going to be building in Renton.”

If reading through Renton’s code was too hard, Renton’s leaders could have done a 30-second google search to get the advice from an organization that Renton helps fund just for such guidance, the Municipal Research Service Center.  The MRSC suggests immediate repair of hazards by the city followed by billing the owner, and does not discuss buying the offending building as the Mayor suggested.

The City should still act to abate the hazards in this building before someone gets seriously injured or killed,  although the City has already squandered the opportunity to save stakeholders tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars.  And the next time one of these buildings goes vacant, Renton leaders should treat our ordinances as the law, and not a “pirate code” that can be arbitrarily altered at will.

_________________________________________________

The MRSC guidance, Mayor’s full quotes, and the City’s Property Maintenance Code are all shown below, for reference. (Background on these buildings can be found here.)

Continue reading →

Mercer Island City Council expresses concern about Renton’s new business jet traffic

New letter in preparation from Mercer Island Mayor to Renton Airport Director

The Mercer Island City Council and Mayor have predictably grown tired of Renton Airport’s new night-time jet traffic whizzing over their homes, less than 400 feet above their treetops.

Many of us familiar with Renton Airport could see this coming.  Renton’s new Public Works Director and Renton Airport Director pushed out five propeller-aircraft businesses this past year and began encouraging private jet activities despite numerous warnings that this would result in many night-time noise complaints.  This new focus on business jets and commercial turboprops was contrary to Renton’s Airport Sustainability Management Plan, a guiding document that the FAA sponsored and our Renton Airport Advisory Committee created specifically to ensure long-term airport harmony with the surrounding community.

Mercer Island is now asking Renton to try to direct the new jet traffic further away from their treetops.  They want the jets to either climb over the Lake Washington channel between Mercer Island and Kennydale, or make a steeper climb to increase their clearance above their Island. Their concerns are safety as well as noise, as these jets can be going 200-300 miles per hour as they cross the middle of Mercer Island.

It remains to be seen whether their traffic pattern requests are possible, and whether these changes would be enough to stem the increasing complaints from residents of Mercer Island.  And while these traffic pattern suggestions seem like reasonable recommendations, they may unfortunately increase jet noise in the Kennydale community with closer aircraft and steeper climb outs.

Our South Renton and Talbot Hill neighborhoods are also getting new night-time jet noise south of the airport. This didn’t have to happen, and it should not be allowed to get worse.

I recommend Renton residents tell our City Council and Mayor to stop encouraging new jet tenants, and restore a strong bias toward propeller-powered aircraft that better serve our Renton community.

Below is a draft letter that captures the Mercer Island Council’s concerns and suggestions.  This letter will go before the Mercer Island City Council for approval on September 16.  If the final version has any changes, I’ll post it.

[Update as of September 16: This letter was unanimously approved as the ninth item on the Consent Agenda at the September 16th Mercer Island City Council meeting]

Continue reading →

Renton Highlands residents will get better access to Light Rail via Metro 111, starting next year

This chart is from Metro’s East Link connectivity program
Link Light Rail Train at South Bellevue Station

I’m overdue to discuss some good news.  The 30-40% of Renton residents that live in certain parts of the Renton Highlands will find they have improved access to Link Light Rail starting next year.  The Metro 111 busses that currently provide 5-day-per-week peak-hour service to Seattle are going to be rescheduled to provide 7-day-per-week all-day access to the South Bellevue Link Light Rail Station.  In addition to allowing people on any daytime schedule to use this service, this change will make the Metro 111 useful for passengers heading up the Eastside to Bellevue and Redmond.

And for those commuting to North Seattle or Lynnwood there is another perk; the trains that cross the lake from Bellevue will continue north in Seattle, without requiring a transfer.

The new Metro 111 route went through an extensive multi-year review process, along with many other Metro route adjustments; the changes received their final approval by King County Council in March of this year.

The Metro 111 will provide express service from Renton Highlands to the South Bellevue Light Rail Station

The changes will go into effect when the Link Light Rail cross-lake connection and the I-405 new express lanes are completed, sometime in 2026.

My extended family is certainly excited about this change.  For the first time in several decades of paying for Sound Transit, we will have ready access to its service from our homes in Renton Highlands.

For those who wish to learn more, this Seattle Transit Blog article provides a nice write-up on all the changes in work for  Metro Bus /Light-Rail connections on the eastside,  and the process that brought them about.

A couple years after that (in 2028 or 2029), South Renton and North Kennydale Residents will find they get good connectivity from the Sound Transit Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service being implemented along the I-405 corridor.  Unfortunately, the expanded parking for the north and south Renton BRT stops has been delayed for another ten years. But the BRT busses will be rolling for those that can find parking, walk, bike, or get dropped off at the Renton BRT stations.

I’ve written many articles regarding Renton’s efforts to obtain equitable access to Sound Transit, and you can read them by clicking here.

My wife Cathy on the Link Light Rail between Bellevue and Redmond.

“Reserve at Renton” towing disputes; is it even allowed to require two permits for ADA parking?

In my previous post, I described how “The Reserve at Renton” has been accused of being too quick to tow resident’s and customers vehicles away.  This includes vehicles that are legally displaying the state disabled parking permit but do not also have a special “Reserve at Renton” issued parking permit.  Disabled residents have reported paying between $500 – $900 to retrieve their towed vehicles.

A quick review of the State’s website says any person who meets the criteria for disabled parking must be allowed to use the parking free of charge, without time restrictions (except in the case of certain on-street parking).  Hence, it’s not surprising that disabled motorists are taken by surprise when their cars are towed away by the “Reserve at Renton.”  I’m not an attorney, so I’m not going to opine on the legality of this, but I think it is very confusing, and I think residents cars should not have been towed without warning if they had a valid ADA permit.  Here is the wording in state law, which can be found here.  (The exceptions mentioned are for on-street parking or fraudulent use of credentials, and don’t apply in this case).

RCW 46.61.582
Free parking for persons with disabilities—Exceptions.
(1) Any person who meets the criteria for special parking privileges under RCW 46.19.010 must be allowed free of charge to park a vehicle being used to transport the holder of such special parking privileges for unlimited periods of time in parking zones or areas, including zones or areas with parking meters that are otherwise restricted as to the length of time parking is permitted, except zones in which parking is limited pursuant to RCW 46.19.050(5). The person must obtain and display a parking placard or special license plate under RCW 46.19.010 and 46.19.030 to be eligible for the privileges under this section.
(2) This section does not apply to those zones or areas in which the stopping, parking, or standing of all vehicles is prohibited or that are reserved for special types of vehicles.

Screenshot from State Law

 

Cars transporting disabled residents and customers, in front of a storefront in the Reserve at Renton apartment building.  Parking spots are marked per state law, but with an additional “Parking by Permit Only” towing sign on the bricks.
“Parking by Permit Only” sign does not make it clear their permit is additional to State Disabled Permit;  and I’m not sure if this is legal anyways for ADA parking required by the building permit

 

Double-permits hang in this car window as resident works to comply with apartment policy

 

Residents of “Reserve at Renton” Senior Living share concerns with Council about unfair towing

The Reserve at Renton income-restricted senior living apartments and the Feast Buffet banquet restaurant sit side-by-side in the Rainier Avenue Fred Meyer Shopping Center. The Reserve also has two businesses located on its ground floor.  Tight parking and new parking permit requirements at the Reserve have resulted in senior residents and store customers having their cars towed, seemingly unfairly in many cases; some have allegedly been towed from ADA spots even when displaying state ADA credentials. (Google Map photo for location reference but does not include current signage- see photos below story for signage)
Reserve at Renton and Feast Buffet are side-by-side

At last night’s council meeting, five speakers from the audience expressed heartfelt disappointment and frustration about confusing parking permit requirements and recent overzealous towing at the Reserve at Renton Senior Living apartments.

The Reserve at Renton opened in 2015 at a site that had previously been in use for school bus parking, and was once the home of the Renton Food Circus (seven restaurants in one dining complex.)  The Reserve also includes two ground floor stores, and is located adjacent to the Feast Buffet banquet restaurant, in Renton’s Fred Meyer Shopping Center on Rainier Avenue.

When the Reserve at Renton opened, there appears to have been an assumption that the large retail lot would ensure adequate parking for everyone. Urban planners at the time were beginning to embrace the idea of getting greater density and parking efficiency through shared parking; the logic being that living units require the most parking in the evening, while retail requires the most parking during the day– so fewer spots are required when they are shared.

But retired residents don’t necessarily leave their homes during the day, and banquet halls can get very crowded, so parking shortages arose.  In response, the Reserve at Renton posted permit-only parking signs and issued limited parking permits.  Any resident or store customer vehicle not displaying the permits could get swiftly towed, apparently even residents or customers parking in ADA spots.  The residents of these apartments have limited income, and many speak English as a second language.  Several residents reported very challenging efforts to reclaim their cars in Kent, and towing bills ranging from $500-$900.  Some reported missing medical appointments from the disruption.

I hope they can get these parking challenges resolved soon, and I think some of the residents deserve refunds.

The situation also serves as a stark reminder that there is a limit to how much Renton can reduce parking and still maintain peace in our city.  It is not reasonable to assume every senior resident can safely walk to and from transit stops, and take 2-3 hour bus trips to get to their medical appointments; they need adequate parking, and so do their caregivers.

Here is a youtube video of last night’s public comment.  The testimony about this topic begins at 25:09.

 

A Google Earth view of the Reserve next to the Feast Buffet and Fred Meyer Shopping Center.

Additional photos of the site, which include the recently added signage, can be seen by clicking below:

Continue reading →